flexible vs rigid frame

Suspension, steering, brakes, wheels & tires

Moderator: FORDification

Post Reply
killakobra
Blue Oval Fan
Blue Oval Fan
Posts: 623
Joined: Sat Jul 12, 2008 11:45 pm

flexible vs rigid frame

Post by killakobra »

rigid frames seem to be advertised everywhere today with new truck and it's got me thinking. i can think of advantages to both

stiff:
better handling
body won't tweak
the frame can handle more weight in theory

flexible:
better traction on uneven ground
the frame is less likely to snap

what do you guys think?
1967 f100 stepside 300ci I6
1969 f100/600 stepside retro truck -under construction-
1972 longbed trailer
fordman
100% FORDified!
100% FORDified!
Posts: 22329
Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2005 8:17 pm
Location: Kansas, Ottawa
Contact:

Re: flexible vs rigid frame

Post by fordman »

i saw a 86 f150 one tiem that the frame had cracked in two. right about the steering box area on our trucks would be.
User avatar
SteveC
Blue Oval Guru
Blue Oval Guru
Posts: 1091
Joined: Mon Oct 29, 2007 11:04 pm
Location: Nebraska, North Platte
Contact:

Re: flexible vs rigid frame

Post by SteveC »

rigid frame your just asking for stuff to break

example: when people put a flat bed on they bolt the bed down in like 8 places all down the side of the frame on each side. pretty much taking all flex out of the frame. The frame broke right behind the cab cause that was the only flex the frame had so the frame broke.
I don't really care about brands Chevy Ford Dodge ...as long as it doesn't sound like two old dudes farting in a coffee can.
http://s169.photobucket.com/albums/u223/imabaka70/ Projects listed on the left side

WOOOT!! i passed my mechanics classes. Now working as a mechanic and waiting to go for my ASE certifications.

1967 f-100 4x4
1969/72 f100 351w EFI m5r2 5 speed
1988 ford f150 xlt lariat
1961 VW Beetle (wifes car)
User avatar
knightfire83
Blue Oval Fan
Blue Oval Fan
Posts: 567
Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 8:52 pm
Location: Nebraska, Lincoln
Contact:

Re: flexible vs rigid frame

Post by knightfire83 »

On an old episode of Trucks! Stacey was in a big rig shop talking about semi tractor frames. They said the frames were a large C channel type in order for them to flex, otherwise on takeoff the frames would snap from the force.

Next time you see a Semi truck loaded down look how much the frame flexes when they take off from a dead stop, it's quite a bit.
1974 Ford F-100 4x4- 360 / manual.
1970 Ford F250 4x4 ~ Sold.
User avatar
fireguywtc
100% FORDified!
100% FORDified!
Posts: 3682
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2008 7:37 pm
Location: North Alabama

Re: flexible vs rigid frame

Post by fireguywtc »

What are you building on or off road? Obviously even a stiff frame needs some flex or ability to fex, but I think you already knew that.
Bill
1967 F-250 LWB 2WD 352 V8, 4spd manual, true duals, 122k original miles (currently being restored)
2024 F350 CCSB, darkened bronze
killakobra
Blue Oval Fan
Blue Oval Fan
Posts: 623
Joined: Sat Jul 12, 2008 11:45 pm

Re: flexible vs rigid frame

Post by killakobra »

knightfire83 wrote:On an old episode of Trucks! Stacey was in a big rig shop talking about semi tractor frames. They said the frames were a large C channel type in order for them to flex, otherwise on takeoff the frames would snap from the force.

Next time you see a Semi truck loaded down look how much the frame flexes when they take off from a dead stop, it's quite a bit.
i've seen a few videos of semi's twisting 30 degrees on take off.
fireguywtc wrote:What are you building on or off road? Obviously even a stiff frame needs some flex or ability to fex, but I think you already knew that.
well of course. otherwise you would lose traction.

why do they stess full boxed frames latly? it seems like bumps manage fine with c frames. maybe it's because they are aluminum now.
1967 f100 stepside 300ci I6
1969 f100/600 stepside retro truck -under construction-
1972 longbed trailer
User avatar
ForingaMex
Blue Oval Fan
Blue Oval Fan
Posts: 590
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 8:18 pm
Location: Ontario, Canada

Re: flexible vs rigid frame

Post by ForingaMex »

Check out this video.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jxv2hOlFav4&feature=fvw
Talk about frame twisting.
-Jake
"Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak out and remove all doubt." -Abraham Lincoln

-02 Dodge Ram Quad Cab
-72 Ford F100 LWB 390/C6 (Retired for now till I can rebuild/transform it)
-2000 Ford Windstar (Family Vehicle)
-92 VW Beetle (Mexican)
killakobra
Blue Oval Fan
Blue Oval Fan
Posts: 623
Joined: Sat Jul 12, 2008 11:45 pm

Re: flexible vs rigid frame

Post by killakobra »

yea. i've run across this a few times
1967 f100 stepside 300ci I6
1969 f100/600 stepside retro truck -under construction-
1972 longbed trailer
User avatar
TNIceWolf
Blue Oval Fanatic
Blue Oval Fanatic
Posts: 864
Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2009 9:52 am
Location: Tennessee Greeneville

Re: flexible vs rigid frame

Post by TNIceWolf »

A boxed frame has been around a long time. But essentially it is used in application where you want to limit the twist of the frame under power. A general use off road vehicle doesnt need it. Something as severe as a rock crawler might.....you would give up the flex to allow for the srength and less breakage in a remote terrain. Just my opinion from working with military vehicles.
Find 'em....Buy 'em....Fix 'em.....Drive 'em....Love 'em

HHC 4/67AR.... Bandits.....88-92

Presently in the stable
1969 Ford F-350 DRW
1989 Chevy S-10 Tahoe ( It gets me to work and back and fetches parts and groceries)
1981 Buick Regal ( My deceased uncles last project/driver....renamed project Regal Eagle to be finished in his honor)
1990 Ford F-150 ( Miss Yvonnes Daily Driver )
My F-350 project http://www.fordification.com/forum/view ... 22&t=41744
User avatar
Caseys71
Blue Oval Guru
Blue Oval Guru
Posts: 1289
Joined: Sat Nov 07, 2009 7:48 pm
Location: Hampstead, North Carolina

Re: flexible vs rigid frame

Post by Caseys71 »

I think that essentially you would want to build a frame with a bit of both,varying on application, just as most have said. If you want rigidity and strength then you want to go for a rigid frame, which would be stronger but easier to snap due to the lack of flex and flexibility comes in handy if you want traction and to have a bit of play in the frame to avoid snapping.
TNIceWolf wrote:A boxed frame has been around a long time. But essentially it is used in application where you want to limit the twist of the frame under power. A general use off road vehicle doesnt need it. Something as severe as a rock crawler might.....you would give up the flex to allow for the srength and less breakage in a remote terrain. Just my opinion from working with military vehicles.
And to add on to that many times people also box in frames on older vehicles with a C-Channel type frame whenever they are customizing things and bolting them vertically through the frame to keep the top and bottom lips of the C-Channel from bending in such as what carcrafter is doing with the crown-vic suspension swap where he did so on the frame nearest the cross-member.
Casey
16 years old with a 40 year old truck (well almost)
Image
1971 F-100302, T-18 4 speed, 3:55 rear, & an Edelbrock sticker on the ashtray.
"Don't worry about what you become, just make sure that you're successful at what you do."- Mr. English
"Value what you DO have over that which you don't."- Forrestbump
"Wanting can sometimes be better than having, never stop dreaming... it's what keeps us all going."- Forrestbump
1984 Toyota 4x4: 22-R, 5-speed, 3" suspension lift, 35's and 5:29's
Post Reply