front springs
Moderator: FORDification
-
- Blue Oval Guru
- Posts: 1121
- Joined: Wed Apr 25, 2007 12:09 am
front springs
just wondering why my f250 and the f100 i just got rid of have 9 coils in the springs and the original springs from my fisrt bump had 11 coils. both f100's were the same so i figured the f250 would of had more. are the springs on the 250 the right ones?
1971 Sport Custom SWB: 360/C6 3.00
1965 Ford Falcon 4Dr: Inline 170 3sp
1965 Ford Falcon 4Dr: Inline 170 3sp
- FORDification
- Site & Forum Admin
- Posts: 8050
- Joined: Sun Jul 11, 2004 12:52 am
- Location: Kansas, Wellsville
- Contact:
re: front springs
It's more the wire diameter that matters than the number of coils. When it's thicker, you don't need as many coils...and it's a lot stiffer. It would all depend on the GVW rating of the truck.
____| \__
-O-----O- Keith
'67 F-100 2WD SWB ~ '69 F-100 4WD SWB w/7" chop ~ 1975 F-250 Ranger XLT Supercab Camper Special



My '67 restoration video
-> Posting and you! <-a MUST watch for all!!
-O-----O- Keith
'67 F-100 2WD SWB ~ '69 F-100 4WD SWB w/7" chop ~ 1975 F-250 Ranger XLT Supercab Camper Special



My '67 restoration video
-> Posting and you! <-a MUST watch for all!!
-
- Blue Oval Guru
- Posts: 1121
- Joined: Wed Apr 25, 2007 12:09 am
re: front springs
i looked at that as well. the ones with 11 coils were 2 3/4 in while the ones with 9 coils were 2 1/2 in. should i put the 11 coil on my f250?
1971 Sport Custom SWB: 360/C6 3.00
1965 Ford Falcon 4Dr: Inline 170 3sp
1965 Ford Falcon 4Dr: Inline 170 3sp
-
- 100% FORDified!
- Posts: 22329
- Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2005 8:17 pm
- Location: Kansas, Ottawa
- Contact:
-
- Blue Oval Guru
- Posts: 1121
- Joined: Wed Apr 25, 2007 12:09 am
re: front springs
the 250 still has the 9 coils on it. i still have the 11 coils from the 70 f100. those are the ones that are thicker in diameter. just wondering if those would be better.
1971 Sport Custom SWB: 360/C6 3.00
1965 Ford Falcon 4Dr: Inline 170 3sp
1965 Ford Falcon 4Dr: Inline 170 3sp
-
- 100% FORDified!
- Posts: 22329
- Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2005 8:17 pm
- Location: Kansas, Ottawa
- Contact:
- Wes
- Blue Oval Fan
- Posts: 732
- Joined: Fri Oct 21, 2005 6:04 pm
- Location: California, Southern& Lake Havasu Az
Keith meant the diameter of the steel used to make the spring, not the diameter of the spring. I would use the f250 springs in the f250
Wes
http://www.fordification.com/galleries/ ... ?cat=10402
67 F250 High boy
69 Bronco
If you can't see fit to stand behind Our Troops...Please stand in front of them
http://www.fordification.com/galleries/ ... ?cat=10402
67 F250 High boy
69 Bronco
If you can't see fit to stand behind Our Troops...Please stand in front of them

-
- 100% FORDified!
- Posts: 22329
- Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2005 8:17 pm
- Location: Kansas, Ottawa
- Contact:
- FORDification
- Site & Forum Admin
- Posts: 8050
- Joined: Sun Jul 11, 2004 12:52 am
- Location: Kansas, Wellsville
- Contact:
re: front springs
The more coils you have, the softer the spring rate. Fewer coils mean stiffer spring.
Unless you're going to be doing a lot of very heavy hauling/towing, I'd go with the softer spring. There really isn't THAT much difference, but it won't ride so harsh in front by choosing the spring with more coils. Just my
Unless you're going to be doing a lot of very heavy hauling/towing, I'd go with the softer spring. There really isn't THAT much difference, but it won't ride so harsh in front by choosing the spring with more coils. Just my

____| \__
-O-----O- Keith
'67 F-100 2WD SWB ~ '69 F-100 4WD SWB w/7" chop ~ 1975 F-250 Ranger XLT Supercab Camper Special



My '67 restoration video
-> Posting and you! <-a MUST watch for all!!
-O-----O- Keith
'67 F-100 2WD SWB ~ '69 F-100 4WD SWB w/7" chop ~ 1975 F-250 Ranger XLT Supercab Camper Special



My '67 restoration video
-> Posting and you! <-a MUST watch for all!!
-
- 100% FORDified!
- Posts: 22329
- Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2005 8:17 pm
- Location: Kansas, Ottawa
- Contact: