flex-o-matic vs std leaf

Suspension, steering, brakes, wheels & tires

Moderator: FORDification

Post Reply
User avatar
Fo-Mo-Co
Preferred User
Preferred User
Posts: 348
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 9:35 am
Location: Indiana

flex-o-matic vs std leaf

Post by Fo-Mo-Co »

I am looking for more of a performance ride on my f100 short bed. I have aftermarket shocks and swaybars and progressive rate front springs. I replaced all the bushings with polly from energy. I am about to install a panhard bar in the rear and replace all the bushings. I dont care about the load or a soft ride. So whats a better option a std leaf pack or the flex-o-matic?
"We don't want tradition. We want to live in the present and the only history that is worth a tinker's dam is the history we make today."

Henry Ford
User avatar
forrestbump
100% FORDified!
100% FORDified!
Posts: 2140
Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2010 12:23 am
Location: California, Phelan

Re: flex-o-matic vs std leaf

Post by forrestbump »

My experience is that the flex-o-matic rear leaf springs will give you a pretty good jolt when you're driving over a large dip and your truck's bed is empty. They're great for hauling a heavy load, but they're not a performance type rear suspension.

Go with the standard shackle rear leaf springs for performance and a smoother ride if that's your goal.
1970, 2WD, F-250, C/S, Dual Tanks, 390 FE (of course), C6, Power Steering, Power Disc Brakes, Dana 60 3.73, Sky View Blue, Ranger XLT

1970, 2WD, F-250, C/S, A/C, Dual Tanks, 390 FE (again, of course), C6, Power Steering, Power Disc Brakes, Dana 60 3.73, Wimbledon White & Sky View Blue, Ranger (almost twin brothers!)

"One of the greatest discoveries a man makes, one of his great surprises, is to find he can do what he was afraid he couldn't do" - Henry Ford

Larry
Post Reply