how much better is a disc brake front end?
Moderator: FORDification
- heep70
- 100% FORDified!
- Posts: 2039
- Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2004 11:03 pm
- Location: Washington, Bonney Lake
- Contact:
re: how much better is a disc brake front end?
Enough bashing. Back to the subject please. Thanks
Greg
1971 F250 "Highboy". SOLD to "Highboy_Firefighter_71"
2000 Subaru Outback limited.
2000 F250 4X4 PSD SuperDuty Crew.
2010 Polaris 800RMK Dragon 155"
2013 Polaris Pro 800 RMK 163"
1980 Built Toyota "Trail Rig".
My last 1971 "Highboy" pics
1971 F250 "Highboy". SOLD to "Highboy_Firefighter_71"
2000 Subaru Outback limited.
2000 F250 4X4 PSD SuperDuty Crew.
2010 Polaris 800RMK Dragon 155"
2013 Polaris Pro 800 RMK 163"
1980 Built Toyota "Trail Rig".
My last 1971 "Highboy" pics
- 390Nut
- Blue Oval Guru
- Posts: 1052
- Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 1:23 pm
- Location: Fife, WA
Re: re: how much better is a disc brake front end?
Technically, yes. Brakes of these types work by transferring kinetic energy from the moving part (drums or rotors) to the non-moving part (shoes or pads). This transfer creates heat in the form of friction. The faster the shoes or pads can absorb and dissipate that heat, the more braking force their is. If the parts can't dissipate the heat fast enough, you get brake fade. The significant difference is the fact that disk brakes use a clamping force from a relatively fixed position rather than outward pressure from a moving position (inducing more flex in the entire system) . The other key factor is that there are TWO surfaces being acted upon, instead of one, and being open to the air they cool much more rapidly, allowing greater energy transfer in a quicker manner.Chaseman wrote:Doesn't the clamping action on the disks provide better stopping power compared to the outward pressure on drums? Also the better airflow over hot stuff to cool down?
Hence the reason why disk pads are generally smaller in surface area then drum shoes, and still provide as much if not more energy transfer.
heep70 wrote:Enough bashing. Back to the subject please. Thanks
That's what we're doing, Greg, really!

Paul

`69 F100 390 4spd driver
http://www.fordification.com/galleries/ ... ?cat=10251
Dura-Spark II Conversion info at:
http://home.comcast.net/~390nut/Dura-SparkII.htm
Pipes71 did once say, "bumps and bikes.. what a great combo!"

`69 F100 390 4spd driver
http://www.fordification.com/galleries/ ... ?cat=10251
Dura-Spark II Conversion info at:
http://home.comcast.net/~390nut/Dura-SparkII.htm
Pipes71 did once say, "bumps and bikes.. what a great combo!"

- heep70
- 100% FORDified!
- Posts: 2039
- Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2004 11:03 pm
- Location: Washington, Bonney Lake
- Contact:
Re: re: how much better is a disc brake front end?
Kewl390Nut wrote:Chaseman wrote:That's what we're doing, Greg, really!

The discussion is very interesting about the two types of brakes.

Greg
1971 F250 "Highboy". SOLD to "Highboy_Firefighter_71"
2000 Subaru Outback limited.
2000 F250 4X4 PSD SuperDuty Crew.
2010 Polaris 800RMK Dragon 155"
2013 Polaris Pro 800 RMK 163"
1980 Built Toyota "Trail Rig".
My last 1971 "Highboy" pics
1971 F250 "Highboy". SOLD to "Highboy_Firefighter_71"
2000 Subaru Outback limited.
2000 F250 4X4 PSD SuperDuty Crew.
2010 Polaris 800RMK Dragon 155"
2013 Polaris Pro 800 RMK 163"
1980 Built Toyota "Trail Rig".
My last 1971 "Highboy" pics
- OldRedFord
- Blue Oval Guru
- Posts: 1314
- Joined: Tue Jan 29, 2008 11:37 pm
- Location: Hull GA
- Contact:
- nytreeman
- New Member
- Posts: 66
- Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 2:49 pm
- Location: Central NY
re: how much better is a disc brake front end?
My power drums on my 1 ton dump work fine stop great but I always have to keep them tight and they do fade on the downhill unless you give them a pump here and there along the way dont want to be riding them hard with 4 or 5 facecord of wood on the back!....but discs aredef easier as far as changing the pads and no adjusting.
I wouldn't mind the change to discs,except for the fact that mine is a dually so its a little harder to come across the necessary parts

I wouldn't mind the change to discs,except for the fact that mine is a dually so its a little harder to come across the necessary parts

~ Don
So much rust ... so little time
my gallery- http://www.fordification.com/galleries/ ... ?cat=10447
So much rust ... so little time
my gallery- http://www.fordification.com/galleries/ ... ?cat=10447
- AlleyCat
- Blue Oval Guru
- Posts: 1283
- Joined: Sat May 12, 2007 8:28 pm
- Location: Pennsylvania, Pittsburgh
Re: re: how much better is a disc brake front end?
To do the disc swap on an F250 you remove the drums and backing plates then install the caliper anchors and rotors.Does anyone know if an F350 works out the same way?nytreeman wrote:My power drums on my 1 ton dump work fine stop great but I always have to keep them tight and they do fade on the downhill unless you give them a pump here and there along the way dont want to be riding them hard with 4 or 5 facecord of wood on the back!....but discs aredef easier as far as changing the pads and no adjusting.![]()
I wouldn't mind the change to discs,except for the fact that mine is a dually so its a little harder to come across the necessary parts

Clay
72 F100 4x2 Custom,289, C4 " Slow Ride "
70 F250 4x2 Ranger XLT , 360, C6 "B52 - IV"
96 F150 4x2 XL, 300, E4OD, daily driver
" Professional Wrecker Operators - We Pull for America "
72 F100 4x2 Custom,289, C4 " Slow Ride "
70 F250 4x2 Ranger XLT , 360, C6 "B52 - IV"
96 F150 4x2 XL, 300, E4OD, daily driver
" Professional Wrecker Operators - We Pull for America "
- 390Nut
- Blue Oval Guru
- Posts: 1052
- Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 1:23 pm
- Location: Fife, WA
re: how much better is a disc brake front end?
Going to have to wait for someone who knows the F350 trucks better for a good answer.
I do know that the F350 has a thicker diameter kingpin than the F250, and the radius arms are heavier (along with different frame mounts and bushings) but I do not know if there were changes between the years.
With that said, `67-`79 F350 all used the same kingpin, so it's possible the same spindles were used that whole time.
I do know that the F350 has a thicker diameter kingpin than the F250, and the radius arms are heavier (along with different frame mounts and bushings) but I do not know if there were changes between the years.
With that said, `67-`79 F350 all used the same kingpin, so it's possible the same spindles were used that whole time.
Paul

`69 F100 390 4spd driver
http://www.fordification.com/galleries/ ... ?cat=10251
Dura-Spark II Conversion info at:
http://home.comcast.net/~390nut/Dura-SparkII.htm
Pipes71 did once say, "bumps and bikes.. what a great combo!"

`69 F100 390 4spd driver
http://www.fordification.com/galleries/ ... ?cat=10251
Dura-Spark II Conversion info at:
http://home.comcast.net/~390nut/Dura-SparkII.htm
Pipes71 did once say, "bumps and bikes.. what a great combo!"
