Do 8,100 GVW F250s have a nut under the lower spring mount?

Suspension, steering, brakes, wheels & tires

Moderator: FORDification

Post Reply
User avatar
robroy
100% FORDified!
100% FORDified!
Posts: 3768
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 4:36 pm
Location: California, Salinas

Do 8,100 GVW F250s have a nut under the lower spring mount?

Post by robroy »

Good morning!

While putting my front end back together on my 8,100lb GVW F250, I noticed a difference between the diagram in the shop manual and my setup. You know the large nut that's supposed to sit right under the bell-shaped lower spring mount plate? I left this nut out when putting my front end together.

At first I thought the nut didn't come out, since I couldn't find it in any of my tear down photos. But then I found two mysteriously out of place and large nuts sitting in the garage! Whoops!

So here is my question: Do all Bumpsides have that big nut that's circled in blue below? Or do some only have the big nut that's directly on top of the lower spring mount plate?

Image

PS. The image is from my computer version of the 1972 Shop Manual, which I'll review in a separate post later on.

Thanks very much for the expert advice!
-Robroy
fordman
100% FORDified!
100% FORDified!
Posts: 22329
Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2005 8:17 pm
Location: Kansas, Ottawa
Contact:

Re: Do 8,100 GVW F250s have a nut under the lower spring mount?

Post by fordman »

everyone that i have taken apart 5 of them has had that nut. bolt f100 and f250.
User avatar
robroy
100% FORDified!
100% FORDified!
Posts: 3768
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 4:36 pm
Location: California, Salinas

Re: Do 8,100 GVW F250s have a nut under the lower spring mount?

Post by robroy »

Okay thanks Fordman! Chances are high that I left the nut out since I didn't take a good photo that included it.

If that's true, then it explains why the bell-shaped lower spring mount plate bent slightly when I tried to torque that connection down. It's because the torque spec for the first nut is way higher than for the nut that sits above the lower spring mount plate.

Anybody else care to share their experiences with this nut?

Thanks Fordman!!!
-Robroy
User avatar
fireguywtc
100% FORDified!
100% FORDified!
Posts: 3682
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2008 7:37 pm
Location: North Alabama

Re: Do 8,100 GVW F250s have a nut under the lower spring mount?

Post by fireguywtc »

my 67 did not have a nut or shim in that area under the lower seat (spring cup).
Bill
1967 F-250 LWB 2WD 352 V8, 4spd manual, true duals, 122k original miles (currently being restored)
2024 F350 CCSB, darkened bronze
User avatar
1971ford
100% FORDified!
100% FORDified!
Posts: 5565
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2007 1:05 pm
Location: Placerville CA

Re: Do 8,100 GVW F250s have a nut under the lower spring mount?

Post by 1971ford »

Mine did not have the shim (F100), but it does have the nut and i think it would be best to have that nut in there for extra superduper gripping power.
-Ryan
User avatar
robroy
100% FORDified!
100% FORDified!
Posts: 3768
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 4:36 pm
Location: California, Salinas

Re: Do 8,100 GVW F250s have a nut under the lower spring mount?

Post by robroy »

Hi Bill and Ryan, thanks for the replies!
fireguywtc wrote:my 67 did not have a nut or shim in that area under the lower seat (spring cup).
Interesting! It doesn't surprise me that a '67 might be a little different, but this is a good data point. Thanks!
1971ford wrote:Mine did not have the shim (F100), but it does have the nut and i think it would be best to have that nut in there for extra superduper gripping power.
Hey Ryan, I really like your phrasing, "extra superduper gripping power." :lol:

Mine didn't have the shim either--that part I'm sure about, since I never saw a shim when I was taking it apart.

I looked at those odd nuts today I found in the garage and I can't think of any other part of the car where they'd fit. That must be them.

Thanks again!
-Robroy
User avatar
robroy
100% FORDified!
100% FORDified!
Posts: 3768
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 4:36 pm
Location: California, Salinas

Re: Do 8,100 GVW F250s have a nut under the lower spring mount?

Post by robroy »

I finally ripped that part of the suspension apart again and installed the nuts; here's a photo of one of them:

Image

I torqued it to around 180 ft/lbs. My wrench only reads up to 150 so I gave it an extra push after hearing the click.

Thanks for the advice!
-Robroy
User avatar
fireguywtc
100% FORDified!
100% FORDified!
Posts: 3682
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2008 7:37 pm
Location: North Alabama

Re: Do 8,100 GVW F250s have a nut under the lower spring mount?

Post by fireguywtc »

Now I am goin to have to do this since I forgot that nut also. I don't know if it was in my 67 when I tore it apart, but better to be safe. I hate doing things twice though :roll:
Bill
1967 F-250 LWB 2WD 352 V8, 4spd manual, true duals, 122k original miles (currently being restored)
2024 F350 CCSB, darkened bronze
User avatar
robroy
100% FORDified!
100% FORDified!
Posts: 3768
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 4:36 pm
Location: California, Salinas

Re: Do 8,100 GVW F250s have a nut under the lower spring mount?

Post by robroy »

Hey Bill! Yeah I know what you mean; it was painful to rip it all apart again!

As I see it, that nut serves one good purpose: it allows you to put a large amount of torque on that connection, as specified in the shop manual, without crushing the factory "bell" shaped lower spring plate. I found that with 150 ft/lbs + on that plate, it crushed a little bit, which makes me think it's not supposed to be the main connection with all the torque to hold the radius arm to the beam.

-Robroy
Last edited by robroy on Tue Mar 31, 2009 6:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
fireguywtc
100% FORDified!
100% FORDified!
Posts: 3682
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2008 7:37 pm
Location: North Alabama

Re: Do 8,100 GVW F250s have a nut under the lower spring mount?

Post by fireguywtc »

robroy wrote:Hey Bill! Yeah I know what you mean; it was painful to rip it all apart again!

As I see it, that nut serves on good purpose: it allows you to put a large amount of torque on that connection, as specified in the shop manual, without crushing the factory "bell" shaped lower spring plate. I found that with 150 ft/lbs + on that plate, it crushed a little bit, which makes me think it's not supposed to be the main connection with all the torque to hold the radius arm to the beam.

-Robroy
excellent point. It makes sense, and I think the best accident is the one you never get in. This would be one way for sure to be safe. Thanks for the heads up :thup:
Bill
1967 F-250 LWB 2WD 352 V8, 4spd manual, true duals, 122k original miles (currently being restored)
2024 F350 CCSB, darkened bronze
Post Reply