same bellhousing?

Suspension, steering, brakes, wheels & tires

Moderator: FORDification

Post Reply
mebruce
New Member
New Member
Posts: 8
Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2005 5:13 am
Location: CANADA, Winnipeg

same bellhousing?

Post by mebruce »

I have a 76 F100 with a 360 and C6 automatic transmission, which I am considering putting into my new 72. The 72 has a 302 with a 3 speed manual. I dont think they have the same bellhousing and are therefore not interchangable, but my dad thinks they are the same.......Who's right?
OLEYELLERTRUCK

Post by OLEYELLERTRUCK »

They are very different, and will not interchange.
User avatar
FORDification
Site & Forum Admin
Site & Forum Admin
Posts: 8050
Joined: Sun Jul 11, 2004 12:52 am
Location: Kansas, Wellsville
Contact:

re: same bellhousing?

Post by FORDification »

:yt:
____| \__
-O-----O- Keith
'67 F-100 2WD SWB ~ '69 F-100 4WD SWB w/7" chop ~ 1975 F-250 Ranger XLT Supercab Camper Special
ImageImageImage
My '67 restoration video
-> Posting and you! <-a MUST watch for all!!
User avatar
lobuck76
New Member
New Member
Posts: 215
Joined: Sun Jul 18, 2004 9:36 pm
Location: Oklahoma

Post by lobuck76 »

Why not put the C/6 in with it?
'71 F-100
User avatar
1970F250
Preferred User
Preferred User
Posts: 387
Joined: Tue Aug 09, 2005 11:29 pm
Location: California

Post by 1970F250 »

:yt:
Steve
binder56jd wrote: If you can't dazzle them with diamonds- baffle them with b------t
mebruce
New Member
New Member
Posts: 8
Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2005 5:13 am
Location: CANADA, Winnipeg

Post by mebruce »

It's an option, but I'd like to save on fuel wherever i can. I'm just using this as a work truck to bring stuff home from home depot and trips to the dump and stuff like that. Gas is $1.03 per liter here, which works out to over $4.00 a gallon! I think I'm just going to keep the manual tranny with 302 in there if I can get the shifter linkages to work a little smoother. I find it fun with the three on the tree!
User avatar
1970F250
Preferred User
Preferred User
Posts: 387
Joined: Tue Aug 09, 2005 11:29 pm
Location: California

Post by 1970F250 »

automatic transmissions save more gas because they keep you in a lower rpm range so your useing more with the 3 speed.
Steve
binder56jd wrote: If you can't dazzle them with diamonds- baffle them with b------t
User avatar
72hiboy4x4
Blue Oval Fanatic
Blue Oval Fanatic
Posts: 978
Joined: Sat Jan 01, 2005 8:53 pm
Location: As far away as I can be from Wa state, without crossing the Mississippi
Contact:

Post by 72hiboy4x4 »

but the C6 robs you of about 10% of your HP thru slippage in the torque converter. I believe a manual tranny driven correctly will save fuel.
In life many men take the path of righteousness, some take the path many others follow (G.M. owners, for example), some take a more arduous path, some a simpler path. I, sir, took the PSYCO-PATH!!
User avatar
1970F250
Preferred User
Preferred User
Posts: 387
Joined: Tue Aug 09, 2005 11:29 pm
Location: California

re: same bellhousing?

Post by 1970F250 »

i didnt think of that :oops: i was thinking how much i would be reving a truck with a manual tranny and all the gas it sucks at high rpms. i agree with you now. :thup:
Steve
binder56jd wrote: If you can't dazzle them with diamonds- baffle them with b------t
Post Reply