Disc vs Drum (power be danged!)

Suspension, steering, brakes, wheels & tires

Moderator: FORDification

Post Reply
User avatar
Ronnie1972
New Member
New Member
Posts: 20
Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2007 8:49 pm
Location: Dallas/FT Worth Area

Disc vs Drum (power be danged!)

Post by Ronnie1972 »

Ok this falls squarely into the noob category, and I did read the drum to disc conversion tutorial, but I have a question about power brakes.

It seems like everyone is thinking about switching Drum to Disc brakes. Can you have power brakes while still having Drum brakes? Is there a reason not to do this? Sorry for the assumedly dumb question, so I'll just roll my eyes on this one so no one has to. :roll:

thanks guys (and gals)
1972 F100 Sport Custom - 390, C6, 3300# Ford 4.11 rear.
User avatar
kaptnkaos
100% FORDified!
100% FORDified!
Posts: 2029
Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2006 1:27 am
Location: Washington, Elma

re: Disc vs Drum (power be danged!)

Post by kaptnkaos »

Hey Ronnie1972..

Yes, you can have power (vaccum assist) drum brakes...
I just did that up-grade on my '68 CS... no disk brakes
It's a really simple proceedure...

1. Undo the bolt that attaches the plunger rod to the brake pedal.
2. Remove the bolts that hold the master cylinder to the firewall.
gently pull the master cylinder forward until the actuating rod clears (being careful not to kink the brake lines)
3. You will need to remove the rod sticking out of the master cylinder...
you might have to pull and twist, it might be really stubborn, but it will come out.
4. Then you mount the vaccum booster to the firewall and attach the actuating rod to the pedal.
5. You will need to insert the power brake plunger into the master cylinder, then mount the master cylinder to the booster.
6. All that's left is to do is attach the vaccum hose to a good vaccum source on your engine...
You shouldn't need to bleed or adjust your brakes, unless they needed it before. You may have to adjust the pedal travel so it engages at the proper level...
Seriously, if I can do it anyone can...

Good luck...
KaptnKA 8) S
Washington...The land where rust is like the family pet...Ya learn to live with it and clean up after its mess... KaptnKAOS

"Olde Skool" '68 Ford Bluebird short bus
"FRODO" '68 F-250 Camper Special project
User avatar
Ronnie1972
New Member
New Member
Posts: 20
Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2007 8:49 pm
Location: Dallas/FT Worth Area

re: Disc vs Drum (power be danged!)

Post by Ronnie1972 »

Thanks Kaptn! Besides not knowing what most of those things are, that does sound "fairly" easy. But that's what google & books are for (that pesky identification). Looks like I'll add this to the project list. And as far as "if I can do it anyone can", you didn't see my carb rebuild. :lol:
Thx for the help!
1972 F100 Sport Custom - 390, C6, 3300# Ford 4.11 rear.
User avatar
seattle67
Blue Oval Fan
Blue Oval Fan
Posts: 739
Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2007 12:48 am
Location: Washington, Seattle

re: Disc vs Drum (power be danged!)

Post by seattle67 »

Hey Ronnie,
The kaptn pretty much said it all in his post, but I wanted to "second the motion" that its an easy modification.

Here is a post I did after I installed a booster on my 67 http://www.fordification.com/forum/view ... ght=master
Dan

"I plan to start procastinating immediately"

Image
User avatar
SteveC
Blue Oval Guru
Blue Oval Guru
Posts: 1091
Joined: Mon Oct 29, 2007 11:04 pm
Location: Nebraska, North Platte
Contact:

re: Disc vs Drum (power be danged!)

Post by SteveC »

im planing on doing this to my 67 this Friday hopefully. I try to remember the camera to take a few pictures.
I don't really care about brands Chevy Ford Dodge ...as long as it doesn't sound like two old dudes farting in a coffee can.
http://s169.photobucket.com/albums/u223/imabaka70/ Projects listed on the left side

WOOOT!! i passed my mechanics classes. Now working as a mechanic and waiting to go for my ASE certifications.

1967 f-100 4x4
1969/72 f100 351w EFI m5r2 5 speed
1988 ford f150 xlt lariat
1961 VW Beetle (wifes car)
User avatar
seattle67
Blue Oval Fan
Blue Oval Fan
Posts: 739
Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2007 12:48 am
Location: Washington, Seattle

re: Disc vs Drum (power be danged!)

Post by seattle67 »

That would be cool Steve. So many people have asked about this, now I really regret not taking pictures each step of the way.
Dan

"I plan to start procastinating immediately"

Image
User avatar
SteveC
Blue Oval Guru
Blue Oval Guru
Posts: 1091
Joined: Mon Oct 29, 2007 11:04 pm
Location: Nebraska, North Platte
Contact:

re: Disc vs Drum (power be danged!)

Post by SteveC »

ya ill do my best to get good pictures...im adding the booster and the changing the master cylinder to the new one that came with the booster
I don't really care about brands Chevy Ford Dodge ...as long as it doesn't sound like two old dudes farting in a coffee can.
http://s169.photobucket.com/albums/u223/imabaka70/ Projects listed on the left side

WOOOT!! i passed my mechanics classes. Now working as a mechanic and waiting to go for my ASE certifications.

1967 f-100 4x4
1969/72 f100 351w EFI m5r2 5 speed
1988 ford f150 xlt lariat
1961 VW Beetle (wifes car)
User avatar
Ronnie1972
New Member
New Member
Posts: 20
Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2007 8:49 pm
Location: Dallas/FT Worth Area

re: Disc vs Drum (power be danged!)

Post by Ronnie1972 »

There appears to be a dual diaphram vs a single diaphram. And 7 in vs 8 in. Any suggestions about which booster type? Was looking at something like this:
http://store.summitracing.com/partdetai ... toview=sku
1972 F100 Sport Custom - 390, C6, 3300# Ford 4.11 rear.
fordman
100% FORDified!
100% FORDified!
Posts: 22329
Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2005 8:17 pm
Location: Kansas, Ottawa
Contact:

Post by fordman »

the smaller boosters were used to clear the valve covers for larger engines such as the 460 in the dentsides. the smaller booster also seemed to come out on the early model truck too for some reason. in 72 you could go either way i think. but the smaller booster could be the way to go.
User avatar
Ronnie1972
New Member
New Member
Posts: 20
Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2007 8:49 pm
Location: Dallas/FT Worth Area

re: Disc vs Drum (power be danged!)

Post by Ronnie1972 »

Anything to the single vs dual diaphram option? Thanks for the advice.
1972 F100 Sport Custom - 390, C6, 3300# Ford 4.11 rear.
User avatar
Supermike
Blue Oval Fanatic
Blue Oval Fanatic
Posts: 955
Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 12:17 pm
Location: Indiana

Post by Supermike »

I asked this question once before as well, Ronnie... because I was considering the booster from Master Power, and theirs are dual diaphragm.

The answer I got (it's buried somewhere in the parts wanted section) is that a dual diaphragm should (in theory) produce more braking power for a smaller booster than the classic single-diaphragm versions that were originally on our trucks (and are available at the supply places now). The DD booster may be easier to operate and give you better pedal feel and braking response.

Historically, the DD boosters were used in the bigger trucks (such as F350) to provide more braking power while using a smaller booster. I think kilog55 and Hawkrod have them on their trucks, so you might hit them up with any questions.

As for me, the single diaphragm booster seems to be working just fine. There is a DEFINITE difference between non-power and powered brakes, though! :thup:
Former owner of a '67 F100 Camper Special
Current owner of a 2022 Ford Bronco Wildtrak
User avatar
kilog55
Preferred User
Preferred User
Posts: 399
Joined: Sun Feb 10, 2008 1:07 pm
Location: Lenoxville, Pennsyltucky

Post by kilog55 »

yeah i went with the DD like supermike said on my 72 with drums all around and you really have to be easy on the brakes or they will lock up havent had it happen on pavement but on dirt it will lock em.

for the small difference in price i went with the DD booster not sure on my plans for this truck as far as motor goes so if i drop a big block in i may not have a clearance problem but can still stop on a dime.

the upgrade is easy to do as long as you mount the brackets up right the first time i did not and it was a pain.
1968 F250 Ranger 2wd 472ci TH400 Caddy powered.
1979 F250 Ranger 4X4 400ci T18
anyone need a 60x24x24 flatbed semi toolbox?
my gallery - http://www.fordification.com/galleries/ ... ?cat=10437
Post Reply