AIM or DJM I-beams; which is better?

Suspension, steering, brakes, wheels & tires

Moderator: FORDification

Post Reply
User avatar
69timemachine
Blue Oval Fan
Blue Oval Fan
Posts: 523
Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2008 12:17 pm
Location: Texas, Houston
Contact:

AIM or DJM I-beams; which is better?

Post by 69timemachine »

My next plan for my '69 is 3" drop I-beams, but I've been cruising the forum and have sensed mixed reviews. Is one brand truly better than the other? I know to go with AIM on the tie rod relocators, but what about the beams themselves? I tend to lean toward AIM because of their better tie rod relocators. Wouldn't it stand to reason that they would therefore build better beams too? Also, I've always heard that you should stick with one manufacturer when doing modifications to minimize headaches. Any opinions out there? FORDification = best site ever!
Jason
"Where there's a wheel, there's a way!"
'69 F100 SWB in Lunar Green with built 351C & TKO-600 5-speed, 4.56 gears, and Eaton TrueTrac Posi.
Future plans: Maybe one day, fresh paint, though I've been told by some, "Don't touch it! It's done!"
'06 Mustang GT 5-speed

Sold: '77 F100, '72 Gran Torino, '76 El Camino with 454 & TH400
User avatar
F100builder
Blue Oval Guru
Blue Oval Guru
Posts: 1304
Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2008 6:55 pm
Location: Idaho, Nampa

re: AIM or DJM I-beams; which is better?

Post by F100builder »

I got the DJM's because of more positive feedback and to me, they do look like a better piece. I've also heard the same about the AIM tie rod relocators and would like to get them too. I have yet to install them however because I'm still gathering a few parts for a disc brake upgrade. I've got everything but new pads and brake hoses. The spindles are from a '78 so I had to get the DJM beams for a '78 (different kingpin length and diameter). This is something to consider before you buy your beams if you hope to upgrade to disc in the future. The kingpins are the same from '67 to '74 on 1/2 tons.
Patrick

ImageImageImageImage
'56 F100; Must.II IFS, 351W bored & stroked to 395c.i. 470hp/483ft-lbs., AOD, 4-link coilover 9" w/ 3.89's
'69 F100; 390, C6, Dana 60 w/ 4.10's
'70 F100; 'new' and latest project soon to have a built 390/C6 and 3.50 gears
To see more of my F100's: http://www.cardomain.com/id/lowfat56
User avatar
69timemachine
Blue Oval Fan
Blue Oval Fan
Posts: 523
Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2008 12:17 pm
Location: Texas, Houston
Contact:

re: AIM or DJM I-beams; which is better?

Post by 69timemachine »

Yeah, I've seen some pics of the DJM beams on the forum and they do look like quality pieces. I haven't been able to see very good pics of the AIM beams though. The online dealers' pics of them are poor. I'm just trying to get a few opinions to finish swaying me one way or the other. I'm definitely going to get the AIM tie rod relocators, even if I decide on the DJM beams and it means mixing parts from different manufacturers. I went ahead and ordered the DJM rear shackle & hanger kit because it looks like a very high quality kit to me. In fact, it arrived today. That's cool that you're going to disc brakes. I'm going tomorrow to pull the power disc setup & I-beams out of a '74 F100. Yes, I'll be sure to get the '67-'74 beams when I do order. That's good info to have. :thup:
Jason
"Where there's a wheel, there's a way!"
'69 F100 SWB in Lunar Green with built 351C & TKO-600 5-speed, 4.56 gears, and Eaton TrueTrac Posi.
Future plans: Maybe one day, fresh paint, though I've been told by some, "Don't touch it! It's done!"
'06 Mustang GT 5-speed

Sold: '77 F100, '72 Gran Torino, '76 El Camino with 454 & TH400
427blackpearl
Preferred User
Preferred User
Posts: 462
Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2007 10:29 pm
Location: Tennessee, Knoxville

re: AIM or DJM I-beams; which is better?

Post by 427blackpearl »

i have the whole djm kit front back and the tie rod relocators, no problem at all with any of it. the relocators were a little hard to put on but i like them
User avatar
convincor
100% FORDified!
100% FORDified!
Posts: 1511
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 5:05 am
Location: Connecticut

Re: re: AIM or DJM I-beams; which is better?

Post by convincor »

427blackpearl wrote:i have the whole djm kit front back and the tie rod relocators, no problem at all with any of it. the relocators were a little hard to put on but i like them
Were's the pics??? :D Inquiring minds would like to see..
68 Custom Cab Shorty, 390, C6, 9"-3.50:1 Currie T/L
"Still Plays With Trucks"
http://s101.photobucket.com/albums/m41/convincor/F100/
User avatar
F100builder
Blue Oval Guru
Blue Oval Guru
Posts: 1304
Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2008 6:55 pm
Location: Idaho, Nampa

Re: re: AIM or DJM I-beams; which is better?

Post by F100builder »

convincor wrote:
427blackpearl wrote:i have the whole djm kit front back and the tie rod relocators, no problem at all with any of it. the relocators were a little hard to put on but i like them
Were's the pics??? :D Inquiring minds would like to see..
:yt:
Patrick

ImageImageImageImage
'56 F100; Must.II IFS, 351W bored & stroked to 395c.i. 470hp/483ft-lbs., AOD, 4-link coilover 9" w/ 3.89's
'69 F100; 390, C6, Dana 60 w/ 4.10's
'70 F100; 'new' and latest project soon to have a built 390/C6 and 3.50 gears
To see more of my F100's: http://www.cardomain.com/id/lowfat56
FordHam
New Member
New Member
Posts: 71
Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2008 2:38 pm
Location: Cornelia, Georgia

re: AIM or DJM I-beams; which is better?

Post by FordHam »

I have purchased the AIM rear shackle hangers and the full rear shackle kit from DJM. Both products are similar, but the AIM product is finished much nicer than the DJM. The DJM finish has a speckled pattern with what looks like pitting, though I assume this is the way they designed it. Their literature states it is powder coated. It looks as if it had been painted then sanded with the black paint left in the pits. I suppose this would only be an issue if you were going for a higher quality look, as these areas would require some filler to smooth them out. Another small pint is they come with red bushings. I would say the DJM hangers look beefier. I spoke with an AIM rep who told me their tie rod relocaters would not work with other I-beams. I also have noticed that neither of these products will work with the flex-o-matic spring, as the rear of the leaf is already to the bed crossmember. Any feedback is appreciated.
69 SWB, 71 LWB with 351C, 72 LWB with rust

No man has ever laid on his deathbed and said, "I wish I had worked more."
User avatar
F100builder
Blue Oval Guru
Blue Oval Guru
Posts: 1304
Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2008 6:55 pm
Location: Idaho, Nampa

Re: re: AIM or DJM I-beams; which is better?

Post by F100builder »

FordHam wrote:I have purchased the AIM rear shackle hangers and the full rear shackle kit from DJM. Both products are similar, but the AIM product is finished much nicer than the DJM. The DJM finish has a speckled pattern with what looks like pitting, though I assume this is the way they designed it. Their literature states it is powder coated. It looks as if it had been painted then sanded with the black paint left in the pits. I suppose this would only be an issue if you were going for a higher quality look, as these areas would require some filler to smooth them out. Another small pint is they come with red bushings. I would say the DJM hangers look beefier. I spoke with an AIM rep who told me their tie rod relocaters would not work with other I-beams. I also have noticed that neither of these products will work with the flex-o-matic spring, as the rear of the leaf is already to the bed crossmember. Any feedback is appreciated.
The DJM hangers are powdercoated with a sort of textured powder some people call 'hammertone' (I believe DJM calls it 'silver vein'). The steel underneath is flat. These could be blasted bare or even hit with a grinder with a soft, flexible, sanding disc and painted or re-coated if desired but perhaps not worth the effort to some. I will most likely just paint over my DJM beams with the same color as ther rest of my suspension (semi-gloss black).
I find it hard to believe that AIM's relocators would not work with DJM beams. Geometrically speaking, the two beams are nearly identical and the relocators do not connect to the beams at all. They connect the tie rod to the steering arm on the spindle. This steering arm should end up in the exact same location in space with either of the two beams, yes? I can't be absolutely sure whether they will work or not but it seems I remember people on this forum have mixed the two brands. It doesn't surprise me that AIM would say that as they would much rather sell you their beams than have you go buy a competitor's!
The shackle kits will NOT work with the Flexomatic as they are longer eye-to-eye than the standard leaf pack. I would like to get the full DJM kit and will probably get some standard springs from the wrecking yard but for now, I'm just flipping my front hangers for a 3-5" drop. Although this won't be as aesthetically pleasing, it's no $$$ and less work! :thup:
Patrick

ImageImageImageImage
'56 F100; Must.II IFS, 351W bored & stroked to 395c.i. 470hp/483ft-lbs., AOD, 4-link coilover 9" w/ 3.89's
'69 F100; 390, C6, Dana 60 w/ 4.10's
'70 F100; 'new' and latest project soon to have a built 390/C6 and 3.50 gears
To see more of my F100's: http://www.cardomain.com/id/lowfat56
prostreetf100
New Member
New Member
Posts: 24
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2004 11:25 am
Location: Washington, Marysville
Contact:

re: AIM or DJM I-beams; which is better?

Post by prostreetf100 »

the aim tie rod relocators will work fine with the the djm beams as they have nothing to do with the beam itself as stated in above post. I just installed a set with some old school cast beams that were built years ago. i have used both and feel that the djm beams are better built.
trickf100
New Member
New Member
Posts: 47
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 4:58 pm
Location: Iowa

re: AIM or DJM I-beams; which is better?

Post by trickf100 »

I bought DJM beams and had to return them. The king pin bore was .008-.010 over size from factory specs. I could not even get a shop to touch them because they said that the tolerances were dangerous. A machine shop quoted me $250 per beam to ream them out and put in bushings to get them back to what factory specs would be. I know a few others in this forum have had the same problem and have to find either expensive or extremely creative ways to fix the problem. I even called DJM and they told me to just crank down the king pin retaining pin to hold it in place. Wrong answer. Needless to say my truck is going to have a stock suspension put back into it and my next one will have a MII in it. What ever route you go good luck because it seems like a crap shoot as far as how the quality goes on any of the brands.
1968 f100 Ranger
1972 f100 Sport Custom
1972 f250 4x4 conversion
User avatar
MadMaxetc
Blue Oval Fanatic
Blue Oval Fanatic
Posts: 850
Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 10:48 pm
Location: Kansas, Wichita
Contact:

Post by MadMaxetc »

If you are going to drive this a lot then don't cut the coils, your tires will wear out a lot faster and it will cost you more money in the end.

IMHO, cutting the coils make the front end look broken (ie. stupid).

If you HAVE to cut the coils, cut 1/2 ring at a time.

You don't even have to take them all the way off the truck. Just unbolt the holder on top (under the spring tower) and jack up the frame so the suspention drops a little. Cut off 1/2 ring and turn it so the end lines up and set it back down. Do this untill you get the drop you want.
Dan

Project: '63 F-100 LWB / 460 / C6 / 2x4 / Work In Progress!
Daily Driver: '67 F-250 Converted to F-100 LWB / 300 / T-5 / 9" 3.70:1 / 235/75R15 Tires
1/4 mile in 17.64s @ 75mph (it's 4200lbs!!!)
"Work Harder! Millions On Welfare Depend On YOU!!"

FORD Girl

Photobucket Pictures
User avatar
kilog55
Preferred User
Preferred User
Posts: 399
Joined: Sun Feb 10, 2008 1:07 pm
Location: Lenoxville, Pennsyltucky

Post by kilog55 »

yeah it will be a driver/cruiser so guess i wont do that then. i was looking at the bag kit but it doesnt list what other parts you need. plus i dont want to hack up my inner fenders as i just bought another set
1968 F250 Ranger 2wd 472ci TH400 Caddy powered.
1979 F250 Ranger 4X4 400ci T18
anyone need a 60x24x24 flatbed semi toolbox?
my gallery - http://www.fordification.com/galleries/ ... ?cat=10437
User avatar
kilog55
Preferred User
Preferred User
Posts: 399
Joined: Sun Feb 10, 2008 1:07 pm
Location: Lenoxville, Pennsyltucky

Post by kilog55 »

yeah i have seen his truck i like the stance on it IIRC he took out 2 coils


how bout some pics to get an idea on the drop from the AIM or DJM beams :clap:
1968 F250 Ranger 2wd 472ci TH400 Caddy powered.
1979 F250 Ranger 4X4 400ci T18
anyone need a 60x24x24 flatbed semi toolbox?
my gallery - http://www.fordification.com/galleries/ ... ?cat=10437
User avatar
convincor
100% FORDified!
100% FORDified!
Posts: 1511
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 5:05 am
Location: Connecticut

re: AIM or DJM I-beams; which is better?

Post by convincor »

just came across this pic by accident. http://www.fordification.com/galleries/ ... 0&pos=-817
68 Custom Cab Shorty, 390, C6, 9"-3.50:1 Currie T/L
"Still Plays With Trucks"
http://s101.photobucket.com/albums/m41/convincor/F100/
User avatar
kilog55
Preferred User
Preferred User
Posts: 399
Joined: Sun Feb 10, 2008 1:07 pm
Location: Lenoxville, Pennsyltucky

Post by kilog55 »

looks like it was cut and welded back together to achieve the drop, and man he's got some meat on those rims :eek:
1968 F250 Ranger 2wd 472ci TH400 Caddy powered.
1979 F250 Ranger 4X4 400ci T18
anyone need a 60x24x24 flatbed semi toolbox?
my gallery - http://www.fordification.com/galleries/ ... ?cat=10437
Post Reply